Skip to main content
Back to all notes

We refused to build a checkout nobody would use

The shop was already selling through WhatsApp and it worked. Moving it to a full checkout would have broken what was working.

Published . Written by Bunga

The request sounded clear: an online shop with a cart and a checkout. Standard work, and we could do it.

But the shop was already selling, and the selling happened in WhatsApp. A buyer asks, the seller answers, the deal closes in that conversation. Not a tidy flow on a diagram, but a living one.

If we built a full checkout, two things were most likely. Buyers used to asking first would still ask first, then wonder why they also had to check out. Or they would stop at the checkout page because it was unfamiliar, and the seller would lose the conversation that usually closes the sale.

So for Golden Vieara we built an online catalogue wired straight into the WhatsApp order flow. Buyers choose in the catalogue, the conversation continues where both sides already know their way around.

This is often read as the less sophisticated choice. We see it the other way. The less sophisticated move is building a complete system nobody uses, then blaming users for not adapting.

A full checkout is still right for a shop with more transactions than any conversation can handle one at a time. What is wrong is reaching for it by default, without looking at how that shop actually sells.